I bet you didn't know that in 2018, an innocent Australian holiday-maker was arrested at Changi Airport and charged with trafficking an amount of cocaine punishable by death. 64-year-old Sydney businessman, Philip George Sceats languished in Changi Prison for the next 353 days, under the pall of the capital charge.
Then one day, as unexpectedly as he had
been arrested, he was taken from his cell to court where he was discharged of
the capital charge and told to leave Singapore within 24 hours.
Sceats’ arrest in Singapore on 7 March 2018
and his release from prison on 23 February 2019 was never reported by any media
at the time.
It was only revealed when his story was
picked up by Australian journalist Natalie O’Brien and published by News Corp
Australia on 18 October 2020.
O’Brien wrote that Sceats’ wealthy Sydney family
had booked a holiday in Langkawi for him and his wife, to celebrate his 64th
birthday. Sceats was to fly from Sydney
to Singapore, where he would wait for six hours to catch his connecting flight
to Langkawi. His wife who was in Hong
Kong for business, would meet him in Langkawi. His family also booked him an
airport hotel room for him to rest before his flight to Langkawi.
In the early hours of 7 March 2018, Sceats
arrived at Changi Airport. Just as his passport was stamped by Singapore immigration,
he heard police officers calling out his name. The police officers then
escorted him to the luggage carousel to pick out his suitcase.
When his suitcase was opened in their
presence, two packets of white powdery substance secured by masking tape were
found inside the suitcase.
Sceats had no idea how those packets got
into his suitcase. The shocked and bewildered
Australian was immediately handcuffed and conveyed to Changi Prison.
Meanwhile, the Singapore police had the two
packets of white powder, which weighed about 90 grams in total,
lab-tested. They were found to contain 39.4
grams of cocaine.
Under Singapore law, anyone found in
possession of more than three grammes of cocaine is presumed to have had that
drug in possession for the purpose of trafficking unless it is proved that his
or her possession of that drug was not for that purpose.
The penalty for trafficking more than 30
grammes of cocaine is death.
Facing the spectre of the hangman’s noose,
Sceats’ plight could not be more dire. Fortunately for him, his family had the
means, influence and determination to save his life. They engaged a well-known Singapore
criminal lawyer to defend him against the capital charge. They also hired a
team of high-credentialed private investigators and consultants to find
evidence that would convince the Singapore authorities that he was innocent of
the charge and that he had been set up by persons unknown. Sceats’ high-powered team included former
high-ranking police officers from three different Australian states.
The team took stock of the many things in Sceats’
case that did not add up.
According to O’Brien, the street value in
Sydney for the amount of cocaine found in Sceats’ suitcase was AUD $27,000 to AUD
$30,000, but it was worth less than half of that in Singapore and Malaysia. There
was no money to be made from smuggling cocaine from Australia to Singapore, so
it was bizarre for anyone to attempt to do so.
Also, Sceats was not searched before he
boarded his flight at Sydney. But by the time he arrived at Changi Airport, Singapore
police officers were waiting for him. They knew his name and his arrival
details. This meant that the Singaporean authorities had been tipped-off by
someone after Sceats' flight left Sydney and before it arrived in Singapore.
After working on Sceats’ case for several
months, his team of private investigators produced a thick file of evidence and
documents. Sceats’ Singapore lawyer furnished the dossier to the
Attorney-General Chambers, urging that his client was nothing more than an
innocent holiday-maker who had been set-up.
On 23 February 2019, not knowing what to
expect, Sceats was brought to Court. That day, a judge granted him a Discharge
Not Amounting to an Acquittal. Freed at
last from his ordeal, Sceats returned to Australia.
While telling Sceats’ story, O’Brien’s article also related Sceats’ experience as
a prisoner in Changi Prison. However, Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) had things
to say about Sceats’ account of his time at Changi Prison. It was MHA’s beef with Sceats’ depiction of
local prison conditions that finally earned him a spot in The Straits Times.
1. Sceats
was held in death row.
MHA
clarified that Sceats "was never housed together with inmates on death
row" but in a separate area meant for remanded persons at Changi
Prison.
2. Sceats
said: “We were allowed out for 20 minutes at a time."
MHA
clarified that Sceats was given an hour of "out-of-cell" time, along
with all other inmates in remand.
3.
Sceats said "Guards come
past your cell every hour. They don’t turn the lights out when you are on the
death penalty."
MHA
clarified that the cells for those in remand are fitted with lights that are
scheduled to automatically switch off at night.
4. Sceats said "It was very strict
regime in there. If you do something wrong they give you the cane on the bare
bum. They say it is like sitting on a
barbecue."
MHA
clarified that inmates are only caned for serious offences, such as aggravated
or repeated assault on another inmate, or assaulting a prison officer. This
punishment is reviewed by an independent committee and is confirmed by the
Commissioner of Prisons before it is carried out.
5. Sceats
said "I think 14 guys were executed while I was there."
Of all the details that Sceats had told
O’Brien about his time at Changi Prison, this was the most chilling.
But MHA gave no rebuttal to that claim.
Sceats was about right when he said he
reckoned 14 hangings were carried out during his time at Changi Prison. No
wonder MHA said nothing about that.
While our national broadsheet’s coverage of
Sceats’ story centred on explaining MHA’s rebuttals, Sceats’ story is not about
prison conditions in Singapore.
Sceats’ story is a cautionary tale of a
holiday-maker who was arrested on arrival in Singapore and imprisoned for almost
a year at Changi Prison on a capital charge; and how it took almost a year, during
which strenuous efforts were made on his behalf, before his nightmare in
Singapore ended.
Singapore may have closed its file on
Sceats, but there is no closure for Sceats.
How
did the Singapore Police come to know Sceats’ name and arrival details?
Who
told Singapore Police Sceats' name and arrival details?
Sceats’ team wrote to both the Singapore
and Australian authorities to find out, but no satisfactory answers have been
obtained.
"I would give anything to know what
really happened," Sceats had told O’Brien.
As for the rest of us, Sceats’ case raises
several troubling questions.
Was
the dossier prepared by Sceats’ team of private investigators instrumental in
securing his freedom?
Could
the Spore authorities have, on their own accord, eventually arrived at the
conclusion that they had caught and imprisoned an innocent man?
If Sceats
did not have the means and resources to obtain the best available expert help,
would he have made it to freedom?
Villains had opened his suitcase, planted
the contraband substance inside it, contacted the Singapore police and provided
them with Sceats’ name and arrival details. Could what happened to Sceats, happen to anyone?
Perhaps Sceats’ profile and circumstances as
a 64-year-old wealthy Australian businessman worked to make him an unlikely cocaine
smuggler.
If the next unlucky person to be framed
by villains is one without means nor favourable profile – what would be his chances
of escaping the hangman's noose?
Indeed, Sceats’ case is very curious, and
also disturbing.
